Energy Intelligence Platform

Designing Intelligence: An AI-Augmented Platform for Oil & Gas Efficiency

My role: AI systems designer
Scope: Enterprise database
Duration: September 2024- July 2025




Energy Intelligence Platform

Designing Intelligence: An AI-Augmented Platform for Oil & Gas Efficiency

My role: AI systems designer
Scope: Enterprise database
Duration: September 2024- July 2025




Energy Intelligence Platform

Designing Intelligence: An AI-Augmented Platform for Oil & Gas Efficiency

My role: AI systems designer
Scope: Enterprise database
Duration: September 2024- July 2025


Context

A private oil and gas company in Turkey was drowning in fragmented systems- SCADA screens, spreadsheets, PDFs, and siloed operational data.
The challenge wasn’t just UI. It was cognitive overload.

We needed to build a tool that didn’t just display data, but understood it.


Context

A private oil and gas company in Turkey was drowning in fragmented systems- SCADA screens, spreadsheets, PDFs, and siloed operational data.
The challenge wasn’t just UI. It was cognitive overload.

We needed to build a tool that didn’t just display data, but understood it.


Context

A private oil and gas company in Turkey was drowning in fragmented systems- SCADA screens, spreadsheets, PDFs, and siloed operational data.
The challenge wasn’t just UI. It was cognitive overload.

We needed to build a tool that didn’t just display data, but understood it.


Challenge


Energy analysts, traders, and operations teams rely on fragmented tools that don’t talk to each other. They struggle with:

  • Lagging data from disparate sources (supply, pricing, emissions, weather)

  • Manual forecasting and reporting

  • No clear visibility into energy efficiency or emissions performance


There was a clear opportunity to design an AI-powered system that centralizes intelligence and enhances decision-making.


Challenge


Energy analysts, traders, and operations teams rely on fragmented tools that don’t talk to each other. They struggle with:

  • Lagging data from disparate sources (supply, pricing, emissions, weather)

  • Manual forecasting and reporting

  • No clear visibility into energy efficiency or emissions performance


There was a clear opportunity to design an AI-powered system that centralizes intelligence and enhances decision-making.


Challenge


Energy analysts, traders, and operations teams rely on fragmented tools that don’t talk to each other. They struggle with:

  • Lagging data from disparate sources (supply, pricing, emissions, weather)

  • Manual forecasting and reporting

  • No clear visibility into energy efficiency or emissions performance


There was a clear opportunity to design an AI-powered system that centralizes intelligence and enhances decision-making.


Approach

I started by mapping the entire energy flow lifecycle- from extraction to distribution and identifying inefficiency nodes.




Phase I : Discovery & systems mapping


Operators, engineers, and analysts across each stage of the energy lifecycle each had different insights. By overlaying these qualitative insights with telemetry coverage data, I identified blind spots- from manual bottlenecks in extraction to Excel-based forecasting at the end-use layer.



Phase II : AI integration & interaction design


These inefficiencies weren’t just technical gaps, they were opportunities to reimagine how human expertise could be scaled through intelligent tooling.


We reframed system inefficiencies into prompt templates scoped for LLM reasoning. I designed natural queries like:


“What are the top 3 contributors to pressure loss in Plant C?”


“Show anomalies in pump behavior over time”



Prototyping & decision logic

Built a modular dashboard showing real-time flows and predictive trends

  • Created “intervention simulation” sliders to test operational decisions

  • Replaced traditional tables with dynamic flow diagrams and system visuals



Approach

I started by mapping the entire energy flow lifecycle- from extraction to distribution and identifying inefficiency nodes.




Phase I : Discovery & systems mapping


Operators, engineers, and analysts across each stage of the energy lifecycle each had different insights. By overlaying these qualitative insights with telemetry coverage data, I identified blind spots- from manual bottlenecks in extraction to Excel-based forecasting at the end-use layer.



Phase II : AI integration & interaction design


These inefficiencies weren’t just technical gaps, they were opportunities to reimagine how human expertise could be scaled through intelligent tooling.


We reframed system inefficiencies into prompt templates scoped for LLM reasoning. I designed natural queries like:


“What are the top 3 contributors to pressure loss in Plant C?”


“Show anomalies in pump behavior over time”



Prototyping & decision logic

Built a modular dashboard showing real-time flows and predictive trends

  • Created “intervention simulation” sliders to test operational decisions

  • Replaced traditional tables with dynamic flow diagrams and system visuals



Approach

I started by mapping the entire energy flow lifecycle- from extraction to distribution and identifying inefficiency nodes.




Phase I : Discovery & systems mapping


Operators, engineers, and analysts across each stage of the energy lifecycle each had different insights. By overlaying these qualitative insights with telemetry coverage data, I identified blind spots- from manual bottlenecks in extraction to Excel-based forecasting at the end-use layer.



Phase II : AI integration & interaction design


These inefficiencies weren’t just technical gaps, they were opportunities to reimagine how human expertise could be scaled through intelligent tooling.


We reframed system inefficiencies into prompt templates scoped for LLM reasoning. I designed natural queries like:


“What are the top 3 contributors to pressure loss in Plant C?”


“Show anomalies in pump behavior over time”



Prototyping & decision logic

Built a modular dashboard showing real-time flows and predictive trends

  • Created “intervention simulation” sliders to test operational decisions

  • Replaced traditional tables with dynamic flow diagrams and system visuals


Solution

The platform combines telemetry, LLM insights, and interactive simulations in a single space. It includes:


  • Live system maps of energy flows and pressure differentials

  • AI-powered queries for surface-to-causal insight generation

  • Simulation tools for scenario modeling

Solution

The platform combines telemetry, LLM insights, and interactive simulations in a single space. It includes:


  • Live system maps of energy flows and pressure differentials

  • AI-powered queries for surface-to-causal insight generation

  • Simulation tools for scenario modeling

Solution

The platform combines telemetry, LLM insights, and interactive simulations in a single space. It includes:


  • Live system maps of energy flows and pressure differentials

  • AI-powered queries for surface-to-causal insight generation

  • Simulation tools for scenario modeling


Key features

LLM-Powered Insight Layer

Users ask natural language questions like:


“What caused the spike in Scope 2 emissions last week?” or
“Show me low-cost supply scenarios for Q3 with <20% emissions increase.”


Key features

LLM-Powered Insight Layer

Users ask natural language questions like:


“What caused the spike in Scope 2 emissions last week?” or
“Show me low-cost supply scenarios for Q3 with <20% emissions increase.”


Key features

LLM-Powered Insight Layer

Users ask natural language questions like:


“What caused the spike in Scope 2 emissions last week?” or
“Show me low-cost supply scenarios for Q3 with <20% emissions increase.”

Scenario Planner

Interactive module for comparing cost/carbon tradeoffs.


Built with computational design patterns to handle variable constraints (supply volatility, policy risk).

Scenario Planner

Interactive module for comparing cost/carbon tradeoffs.


Built with computational design patterns to handle variable constraints (supply volatility, policy risk).

Scenario Planner

Interactive module for comparing cost/carbon tradeoffs.


Built with computational design patterns to handle variable constraints (supply volatility, policy risk).


Behind the build

  1. User need -> Model input mapping


    I started by collecting real queries from energy analysts. Not just what they asked, but how they asked. These were often vague, multi-layered, and data-dependent ("Why are Q2 carbon levels high?"). We broke them down into structured prompt templates the LLM could understand, while preserving domain-specific nuance

  1. Prompt Engineering + Guardrails


    I built a prompt framework that wrapped every question in context: site location, timeframe, and available datasets & scoped responses to known variables. For example:
    “Using data from Sites A–C, explain the rise in Scope 2 emissions between May–June.”


  1. LLM + Data Layer Integration


    Structured prompts flow through a preprocessing engine, are interpreted by a context-aware LLM, and connected to real-time data via an API layer. The result: scoped, timely answers delivered directly into the analytics stack.


Behind the build

  1. User need -> Model input mapping


    I started by collecting real queries from energy analysts. Not just what they asked, but how they asked. These were often vague, multi-layered, and data-dependent ("Why are Q2 carbon levels high?"). We broke them down into structured prompt templates the LLM could understand, while preserving domain-specific nuance

  1. Prompt Engineering + Guardrails


    I built a prompt framework that wrapped every question in context: site location, timeframe, and available datasets & scoped responses to known variables. For example:
    “Using data from Sites A–C, explain the rise in Scope 2 emissions between May–June.”


  1. LLM + Data Layer Integration


    Structured prompts flow through a preprocessing engine, are interpreted by a context-aware LLM, and connected to real-time data via an API layer. The result: scoped, timely answers delivered directly into the analytics stack.


Behind the build

  1. User need -> Model input mapping


    I started by collecting real queries from energy analysts. Not just what they asked, but how they asked. These were often vague, multi-layered, and data-dependent ("Why are Q2 carbon levels high?"). We broke them down into structured prompt templates the LLM could understand, while preserving domain-specific nuance

  1. Prompt Engineering + Guardrails


    I built a prompt framework that wrapped every question in context: site location, timeframe, and available datasets & scoped responses to known variables. For example:
    “Using data from Sites A–C, explain the rise in Scope 2 emissions between May–June.”


  1. LLM + Data Layer Integration


    Structured prompts flow through a preprocessing engine, are interpreted by a context-aware LLM, and connected to real-time data via an API layer. The result: scoped, timely answers delivered directly into the analytics stack.

Impact

  • Reduced insight latency by 40%

  • Anomaly detection time cut from 12 hours → 15 minutes

  • Built an interface layer compatible with legacy SCADA systems

Impact

  • Reduced insight latency by 40%

  • Anomaly detection time cut from 12 hours → 15 minutes

  • Built an interface layer compatible with legacy SCADA systems

Impact

  • Reduced insight latency by 40%

  • Anomaly detection time cut from 12 hours → 15 minutes

  • Built an interface layer compatible with legacy SCADA systems


Reflection

This project felt personal. I was translating generational know-how into augmented intelligence, bridging legacy expertise with future systems.


It pushed me to rethink what usable AI really means in high-stakes environments. The goal wasn’t to oversimplify, but to make complexity navigable. I walked away with a deeper conviction: when paired with thoughtful interaction design, LLMs can act as true cognitive partners.

25.7617° N, 80.1918° W

©2025. All right reserved



Reflection

This project felt personal. I was translating generational know-how into augmented intelligence, bridging legacy expertise with future systems.


It pushed me to rethink what usable AI really means in high-stakes environments. The goal wasn’t to oversimplify, but to make complexity navigable. I walked away with a deeper conviction: when paired with thoughtful interaction design, LLMs can act as true cognitive partners.

25.7617° N, 80.1918° W

©2025. All right reserved



Reflection

This project felt personal. I was translating generational know-how into augmented intelligence, bridging legacy expertise with future systems.


It pushed me to rethink what usable AI really means in high-stakes environments. The goal wasn’t to oversimplify, but to make complexity navigable. I walked away with a deeper conviction: when paired with thoughtful interaction design, LLMs can act as true cognitive partners.

25.7617° N, 80.1918° W

©2025. All right reserved


🔒 Protected Project

This work is under NDA, but I’d love to share it with you. Enter the password to take a look.


Need the password? Shoot me a message